UPDATE: Bloodthirsty Liberal weighs in: How Do You Solve a Problem Like Sarah?
UPDATE: Phyllis Schlafly agrees with Decidedly Right:
“The nomination of Sarah Palin for vice president is a big step forward for women, but a long backward step for the movement we have been taught to call feminism.”
(h/t to Michelle Malkin)
Did anyone catch her on Hannity and Colmes? Sean nailed her to the wall about her hypocritical form of “feminism,” and she tried to babble her way out of it. And babble, and babble, and babble.
C’mon, Christine, answer the question: “Would you consider Sarah Palin being elected Vice President a step backward for women?” Your hemming and hawing was quite telling. It’s obvious that you feel that any accomplishments by a liberal woman (such as your own mother) are a step forward, while accomplishments by a conservative woman (such as Sarah Palin) are a step back. Well, you’re right, Christine, it is a step back. A step back for you and the liberal feminist agenda. A giant step back. You’re being rejected soundly by a great many women.
Really, Democrats, is Christine Pelosi the best you’ve got?
EDITED TO ADD: Video and transcript here.